Available Pro Bono Cases

Wisconsin SCR 31.05(7) states that an attorney may claim one CLE credit for every five hours of pro bono work, up to six credits per reporting period. The Western District of Wisconsin is looking for attorneys to volunteer to assist pro se parties with legal services on a pro bono basis. If an attorney, or firm, would like to volunteer legal services, but these cases are not a good fit, the Court will keep your name, or the name of your firm, on a list to contact about future representation.

These cases have passed screening, and the Court is requesting volunteers to represent on a limited or full-case basis, as identified. Please contact Melissa Hardin at 608-261-5718 with interest or questions.

  • Juan Nieto

    16-cv-163-jdp

    Plaintiff Juan Nieto is an inmate at Stanley Correctional Institution. Several Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and medical malpractice claims survived summary judgment and are headed to trial. They concern prison staff’s failure to diagnose two broken toes for several years. His first language is Spanish and he doesn’t appear to be fluent in English, so a Spanish-speaking attorney would be helpful.

  • Anthony Heard Jr.

    20-cv-548-jdp

    Looking for counsel since 11/15/2021.

    Plaintiff Anthony Heard, Jr. was granted leave to proceed on claims that prison medical staff at WSPF delayed in treating his severe leg swelling, exacerbating the problem and caused him pain.  Heard is currently undergoing treatment for cancer, which while not part of the case, is limiting his ability to litigate it.  Currently pending are defendants motions for summary judgment.  The court will reset the case schedule, including briefing deadlines after counsel has been recruited.   Attached are the complaint, screening order and order granting recruitment of counsel

  • Mirk Girtler

    19-cv-358-jdp

    Looking for counsel since April 19, 2022

    Plaintiff Mark Girtler was allowed to proceed on Eighth Amendment claims against WSPF defendants for their alleged failure to protect him from at least two attacks by other inmates.  He began his case pro se and some of his claims survived summary judgment.  He secured counsel on the eve of trial in November 2020, but trial was subsequently postponed a number of times for various reasons.  In December 2021, Girtler’s counsel announced he was closing down his practice and the court allowed him to withdraw.  Girtler has not been able to find successor counsel on his own, so the court agreed to stay the trial date and recruit counsel for the jury trial.   Attached are the court’s summary judgment and motion in limine orders.

  • Patrick S. Tate

    20-cv-704-jdp

    Looking for counsel since 2/11/22

    Plaintiff Patrick Tate was allowed to proceed on claims relating to his allegation that when he was incarcerated at Fox Lake Correctional Institution, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by an as-yet-unidentified correctional office, then later physically assaulted by another inmate after he complained about the sexual assault.   The court stayed the case before the scheduling conference and to recruit counsel for the limited purpose of identifying the Doe defendant.  Attached is the order for recruitment of counsel.